By Austin Jenkins
Northwest News Network
It's one-party-rule in Olympia these days. Democrats control the House, the Senate and the Governor's office. Plus, there's a hefty budget surplus. You'd think these would be glory days for lobbyists who work on behalf of children, the elderly and the poor. Instead, there's a sense of frustration and disappointment.
The budget debate on the floor of the Washington State House tells the story.
Saying, "They say that justice is blind and I say we cannot turn a blind eye on the children in our state," Mercer Island Democrat Judy Clibborn tries to get an extra $3 million to give health coverage to children of immigrant parents.
Clibborn's amendment passes. It's an important victory for lobbyists who advocate on behalf of poor children. But even with the extra money, 5,000 kids will remain on a waiting list, according to Seattle-based Children's Alliance. Jon Gould is deputy director.
"We believe that there is nothing more clear and present than a parent who applied for health coverage for their child in December and to tell those parents they have to wait to get coverage is just unacceptable when we have such a big budget surplus," says Gould.
With a $1.5 billion surplus and Democrats in charge, the so-called poverty lobby had great expectations for the 2006 legislative session. They've had some key successes. But the overall feeling is majority Democrats have shortchanged programs for vulnerable populations.
Jerry Reilly is a longtime lobbyist for the Eldercare Alliance. He says his constituents feel Democrats have pushed eldercare issues to the backburner in favor of tax breaks for businesses and other funding priorities.
"Given the context of $1.5 billion and people's additional frustration when they see tax reductions occurring and they see the context of elder issues apparently being a lower priority than education, higher education, environmental concerns, mental health concerns, they're frustrated," he says.
Democratic leaders seem to have little patience for the discontent. Lynn Kessler of Hoquiam is House Majority Leader. She points out Democrats have appropriated millions of dollars for a host of programs that serve the poor, the uninsured, the young and the old.
"In the end,” says Kessler, “we think we've given so much this year and we have repaired much of the safety net that has been disrupted in the last four years. So we feel good about it. I'm sorry that they have to be at their own party and feel so bad when they should be celebrating."
Kessler and fellow Democrats say they're trying to strike a balance between shoring-up programs and saving for the future. In fact fiscal restraint has become the rallying cry of Governor Chris Gregoire and Democratic lawmakers. They know if they spend down the surplus, they could face a deficit next year. Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown of Spokane says the goal is to avoid roller coaster budgeting.
"It's important from a budget perspective to not set ourselves up for a two-year budget cycle next year where we have to pull back again and make big cuts or try to put tax increases on the table that aren't going to go anywhere," Brown says.
That tax and spend cycle has burned Democrats in years past and they've been punished at the polls. They don't want to make that mistake again. This is, after all, an election year when all House members and about half the Senators are up for re-election. And it won't be too long before Governor Gregoire is running again. She and Democratic lawmakers want to prove - despite what Republicans say - that they are fiscally responsible.